Faithwire
  • Watch
  • Go!
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • SCOTUS
  • Life
  • Religious Liberty
  • News
  • Politics
  • Faith
  • Opinion

Christians Once Dominated Hollywood: The Fascinating Movie-Making History You Likely Didn’t Know

Share Tweet
By Billy Hallowell
Editor

March 21, 2017

The content streaming from Hollywood has, no doubt, devolved in recent decades, with sex, violence and racy content increasingly permeating our entertainment.

But did you know there was once a time in the not so distant past when movie studios made a pointed effort to self-censor, rejecting content seen as too sexual, violent or immoral?

READ: Why the Mystery Surrounding Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch’s Faith is Sparking Debate

The roots of self-censorship were set in the 1920s when feature films were still in their infancy. At the time, actors and performers were reportedly getting quite unruly, with their morally bankrupt behaviors raising more than a few eyebrows.

In real-life scenes that mirror some of what we’ve seen happen in Hollywood in recent decades, stars were overdosing, comic Fatty Arbuckle went on trial for alleged manslaughter over the case of a dead actress, and actress Mary Pickford reportedly got divorced to marry fellow actor Douglas Fairbanks, as NPR reported.

'You put the good stuff in, you get the good stuff out,'
The Hollywood Sign is seen on March 1, 2017 in Los Angeles, California. (David Livingston/GC Images)

Such incidents made religious leaders nervous, leaving them looking for ways to halt the negative influence that was pouring down from Tinseltown into mainstream culture. Those fears manifested themselves in the form of state censorship boards, which essentially gave the government the right to crack down on movie content.

In fact, local governments essentially regulated films from 1915 until 1952, Dr. Thomas Doherty, professor of American studies at Brandeis University, told me in an interview for my new book, “Fault Line: How a Seismic Shift in Culture Is Threatening Free Speech and Shaping the Next Generation.”

“Movies [had] no First Amendment rights, which means state censorship boards, city censorship boards, a sheriff who didn’t like the film, could basically go in and shut down the movie,” Doherty explained.

Between the pressure from faith leaders and the government intrusion into the matter, it didn’t take long for Hollywood to opt for self-censorship, with the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America, an organization that later became the Motion Picture Association of America, creating a moral code that Hollywood studios subscribed to when releasing films.

Industry insiders came together to form the organization, which was headed by former politician William H. Hays from 1922 to 1945, as an effort to stave off government censorship. The Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America, under Hays’s leadership, set up a series of control measures aimed at trying to keep Hollywood in check.

But there’s also a deeper story there: Christian leaders actually played an in-depth role in shaping what was coming out of Hollywood at the time — something that would seem unimaginable today.

“Roman Catholics were upset about the moral and social content of Hollywood cinema in the 1920s, so in around 1930, a couple prominent Catholics — a guy named Martin Quigley, who edited Motion Picture Herald … and a devout Catholic, a big-time Catholic layman and a Jesuit priest, named Father Daniel A. Lord — got together and wrote a moral code for the movies,” Doherty explained. “It had a moral philosophy, and then a list of prescriptions, things you should do, things you couldn’t do.”

It was this production code that offered up strict guidance for what would absolutely not be tolerated in Hollywood productions. Sex, crime, offensive language, nudity, illegal drug use, the ridicule of religion, and certain other behaviors were cracked down on.

It should be noted, though, that the Production Code didn’t have an immediate impact, with many in Hollywood simply ignoring it. According to Doherty, the code was adopted by Hollywood in 1930 to “just get the Catholics off their back,” with studios proceeding to essentially ignore it for the next four years; it’s a time period that people now refer to as the “pre-code era”—a period when the code was active, but wasn’t yet fervently enforced.

“The Catholics get very upset, and in 1933, ’34, they form something called the Legion of Decency, which is a political action group,” Doherty said. “Unlike today, when the Catholic Church could tell its parishioners to do something and [they’d] ignore it, back in the ’30s they actually abided by it. So the Catholics could really keep people out of the seats of theaters if they condemned a movie, or if they said a movie would jeopardize your soul.”

This pushback created problems for movie moguls, which led to the creation of the Production Code Administration to ensure that the movie industry’s moral code that had been ignored since 1930 would finally be upheld; that move was more successful.

So, aside from the censorship concerns, why did Hollywood create and finally come to comply with the code? Much of the motivation boiled down to money, according to PBS. Hays was reportedly able to convince studios that abiding by the Production Code was the most prudent path forward. After all, if they didn’t, they would end up doling out more money to change films once government censorship boards got a hold of them.

But Dr. Ted Baehr, a film critic and the founder of Movieguide, told me in an interview for “Fault Line” that studio heads’ hands weren’t simply forced; they saw immense benefit associated with the Production Code. They believed that it “protected them against unfair competition, that the code protected them from a race to the bottom, that the code built the industry into being a more effective and successful tool.”

Regardless of how it was accomplished, the faith effort helped turn Hollywood films and culture around from the debauchery of its early days to a more morally centered industry that took into account the impact that entertainment would have on the masses. Christian organizations like the Legion of Decency and the Protestant Film Office (another Christian group involved in shaping content) apparently made a pretty big difference, offering a buffer between Hollywood and the culture at large.

Oscar statues are seen on the red carpet during preparations for the 89th Academy Awards in Hollywood, California on February 25, 2017. (ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP/Getty Images)

Baehr has often spoken out about this history, telling Charisma News, “Prior to the involvement of these Christian men in 1933, American movies were morally bankrupt—full of nudity, perversity and violence.”

Eventually, though, the influence of these religious bodies waned. The Protestant Film Office closed up its advocacy offices in 1966 after some denominational funding was pulled and the Christian groups connected to the effort reportedly didn’t care to continue it—a scenario that Baehr believes had profound consequences on Hollywood and the culture at large.

“It set the scenes for moral collapse and degradation, and you went from The Sound of Music to the first X-rated film,” he told me. “The change that took place created a culture—because culture is downstream from the mass media of entertainment—created a culture which…got new scripts of behavior.” Baehr continued, “The new scripts of behavior [were], ‘Let’s all go out and have sex out of wedlock, take drugs, and enjoy ourselves.’”

Doherty said the Legion of Decency is still around, but has changed its name to the National Catholic Office for Motion Pictures. While the body still rates movies, he said the organization isn’t as influential as it once was.

While there’s certainly an argument to be made against censorship, it’s also quite notable that society was once so repulsed by negative content that Hollywood was forced to change its ways—and chose to do so accordingly.

Decades ago the industry seemed to see itself as having a responsibility of sorts to protect—or at least consider its impact. Today, though, it’s not uncommon to see many actors and actresses doing very little to ensure their work has a positive impact on society and, in particular, on youths. There’s certainly been a cost to that dynamic.

This piece was originally published here.

—

Other Must-Read Stories:

– Why the Mystery Surrounding Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch’s Faith is Sparking Debate

– Man Discovers Massive Diamond Worth Up to $62 Million — but It’s What He did With It That’s Really Capturing Attention

– What Was Daily Life Like for Jesus? Archaeologists are Now Painting a Much Clearer Picture

– School District Fights Back Against Atheist-Led Lawsuit to Derail Optional Bible Classes for Students

Latest

  • Faith

    Joe Rogan Is Reportedly Attending Church ‘Consistently,’ Christian Apologist Reveals

  • Faith

    Christian College Scores Big Victory After ‘Incredible Attacks’ From Biden Admin, Stunning Claim by Trump Officials

  • Faith

    Digital Babylon: Biblical Wisdom from Daniel for Today’s Social Media Age

  • Faith

    Christian Summer Camp Fights Back Amid Claims Government Could Shut It Down Over Gender Law

  • Faith

    Pastor Breaks Down Why Christians Simply Can’t Ignore Angels and Demons: ‘We Have Emasculated the Gospel’


Sponsored
Sponsored

Newsletter
Signup

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

  • Joe Rogan Is Reportedly Attending Church ‘Consistently,’ Christian Apologist Reveals
  • Christian College Scores Big Victory After ‘Incredible Attacks’ From Biden Admin, Stunning Claim by Trump Officials
  • Digital Babylon: Biblical Wisdom from Daniel for Today’s Social Media Age
  • Christian Summer Camp Fights Back Amid Claims Government Could Shut It Down Over Gender Law
  • Pastor Breaks Down Why Christians Simply Can’t Ignore Angels and Demons: ‘We Have Emasculated the Gospel’

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016

Categories

  • Christian Persecution
  • Coronavirus
  • culture
  • Culture
  • Entertainment
  • Faith
  • Faith
  • Family
  • George Floyd
  • Go!
  • Israel
  • Life
  • Life
  • Lifestyle
  • Media
  • Men
  • Mission Haiti
  • News
  • News
  • Opinion
  • P.O.V
  • Politics
  • Politics
  • Roe
  • Sponsored
  • Sports
  • Virtue
  • Women

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Navigation

  • Watch
  • Go!
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • Staff
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Sign up to get our newsletter your inbox every day.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Newsletter Signup

Do you want to read
more articles like this?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.