Faithwire
  • Watch
  • Go!
  • Podcasts
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • News
  • Politics
  • Coronavirus Updates
  • Faith
  • Opinion
  • Christmas
  • Set Free Course

Christian Adoption Agency Can’t Be Closed for Refusing to Place Kids with Gay Couples, Fed Court Rules

Photo by Sharon McCutcheon/Unsplash
Photo by Sharon McCutcheon/Unsplash
Share Tweet
By Tré Goins-Phillips
Editor

October 6, 2020

A federal court judge decided Monday a New York-based Christian adoption agency cannot be forced to shut down due to its policy of only placing children with married heterosexual couples.

U.S. District Court Judge Mae D’Agostino granted the preliminary injunction against the New York Office of Children and Family Services after the Christian agency, New Hope Family Services, filed a lawsuit against state officials in 2018, when they claimed the organization’s faith-based policy violated a 2013 state law prohibiting discrimination against adoption applicants on the basis of sexual orientation or marital status.

NFL Star Benjamin Watson Calls Out Joe Biden, Favors Overturning Roe v. Wade

In her decision, D’Agostino rebuked OCFS for its interpretation of the law, arguing the state’s application “demonstrates some animosity towards particular religious beliefs.”

“While not all of the evidence discussed weighs in favor of a finding of hostility when viewed individually, the totality of the evidence indicates that section 421.3(d), as promulgated and enforced by OCFS, is not neutral and appears to be based on some hostility towards New Hope’s religious beliefs,” she wrote.

The judge continued:

In finding hostility, the Court relies on a number of factors. … Those factors include OCFS’ implementation of the seemingly permissive language of New York Domestic Relations Law Section 110 as mandatory requirements in section 421.3(d), the severity of OCFS’ actions and the lack of explanation as to the legal authority to engage in such action, and statements made by OCFS personnel which demonstrate their motivations in enforcing section 421.3(d).

In a statement released Monday, Roger Brooks of the Alliance Defending Freedom, the law firm representing the faith-based agency, said the ruling shows the state’s actions “violated core rights protected by the First Amendment.”

“This ruling means that New Hope can continue offering the exceptional support it has provided for decades while its lawsuit challenging the state’s unconstitutional policy continues,” he said of D’Agostino’s injunction.

Atheist Group Files SCOTUS Brief Supporting Christian’s Right to Share Faith on Campus

D’Agostino’s decision came after a July ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The three-judge panel ruled in favor of New Hope, sending the case back to the district court. Judge Reena Raggi concluded the Christian group has valid “suspicion of religious animosity.”

In order to continue working in New York, she wrote, New Hope would have to “compromise — i.e., abandon — its own religious views about family and marriage and subscribe to the state’s orthodoxy on such matters.”

Latest

  • News

    LIVE: Watch Our Coverage of Biden’s Inauguration

  • Politics

    In Farewell Address, Trump Urges Americans to Pray for Biden Administration and Country’s Success

  • Media

    Katie Couric Says Trump Supporters Need to Be ‘Deprogrammed’

  • News

    Biden Names First Transgender Person to Serve in Federal Position

  • News

    A Show of Force Across U.S. as State Capitals Boarded Up for Inauguration Day: ‘All We Can Do Is Pray to God’


Sponsored Sidebar Default (2)

Navigation

  • Watch
  • Go!
  • Podcasts
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Staff
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Sign up to get our newsletter your inbox every day.

Newsletter Signup

Do you want to read
more articles like this?


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement